Former Labour Party presidential candidate Peter Obi has criticized President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State, calling the decision “unconstitutional and reckless.”
In a post on his X (formerly Twitter) handle, Obi expressed concern over what he sees as an abuse of power, arguing that the move undermines democratic progress and disregards the rule of law.
“The unilateral decision of President Bola Tinubu to remove Governor Similaya Fubara of Rivers State from office is not only unconstitutional but also reckless,” Obi stated.
“It has plunged us back into a state of lawlessness, hugely undoing the progress we have made in these 26 years of democratic journey.
“By disregarding the rule of law, the President has shown a dangerous willingness to trample on democracy.”
Obi further argued that the political tensions in Rivers State did not warrant such an extreme response and accused the administration of selectively interpreting constitutional provisions to justify its actions.
“The declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State is not just reckless—it is a clear attempt to return us to a state of nature and tighten its grip on power at all costs.
“It is a degrading backdoor imposition of martial rule on a strategic part of the federation with all the implied negatives.
“The political situation on the ground in Rivers does not justify such an extreme measure, and it is also a biased interpretation of section 305(1) of the 1999 constitution.
“A state of emergency does not mean an elected Governor can be removed unilaterally. This decision does not align with democratic norms or good governance. Instead, it appears to be a predetermined action serving specific interests rather than the collective good of the people of Rivers State and Nigeria.
“This action constitutes an unconstitutional overreach, setting a dangerous precedent that threatens democracy, the rule of law, and the separation of powers. If left unchecked, it could foster a culture of impunity.”
Obi’s remarks add to growing criticism of the President’s decision, as concerns rise over the implications this move could have on Nigeria’s democratic stability.
